Why Corrosion Matters Specifically

Among all the factors that drive water pipeline failure (corrosion, ground movement, water hammer, third-party damage, freeze-thaw cycles, manufacturing defects), corrosion is unusual in two important ways:

​

1. It's progressive and predictable. Unlike a sudden third-party strike or a freeze break, corrosion damage accumulates over years or decades. With the right surveys and modeling, it can be predicted, located, and prioritized before failure occurs.

​

2. It's preventable, or at least manageable. Cathodic protection, protective coatings, and selective replacement can extend the service life of a pipeline by decades. Other failure modes are harder to mitigate proactively.

​

This means corrosion is one of the few major pipeline failure mechanisms that responds well to engineering investment. A utility that takes its corrosion program seriously gets measurable returns: longer asset life, fewer surprise failures, better data to support capital planning, and stronger justification for rate cases and bond elections.

​

Causes of Corrosion on Buried Water Pipelines

The corrosion picture on any specific pipeline is a combination of several factors:

​

Soil Environment

Soil chemistry, moisture content, resistivity, pH, and chloride concentration all influence how aggressively a buried pipeline will corrode. Highly resistive, dry, neutral-pH soils are relatively benign. Low-resistivity, wet, acidic, or high-chloride soils can drive accelerated corrosion on bare or poorly coated steel and ductile iron.

​

Pipe Material and Coating Condition

Different pipe materials have very different corrosion profiles. Ductile iron, steel, mortar-coated and lined concrete cylinder pipe (MLCP), prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP), and cast iron each fail in characteristic ways. Coating type and coating condition often matter more than the underlying pipe material.

​

Stray Current and Interference

Pipelines running near or parallel to DC transit corridors, high-voltage AC transmission lines, or other underground utilities can pick up stray currents that dramatically accelerate corrosion at discharge points. This kind of interference is often invisible until a survey reveals it.

​

Cathodic Protection Status

Pipelines designed for cathodic protection that have inadequate, damaged, or aging CP systems can corrode much faster than pipelines that were never intended for CP and rely entirely on their coating. CP system condition is often the single most actionable factor in a corrosion risk assessment.

​

Operational Factors

Water chemistry, pressure cycling, flow conditions, and maintenance history can all influence internal corrosion rates, though internal corrosion is generally less significant than external corrosion for buried water mains.

​

How ICG Assesses Corrosion Risk

A corrosion risk assessment is a structured engineering process that combines field data, asset records, and senior engineering judgment to identify where on a pipeline system corrosion is most likely to be a problem. ICG's approach typically includes:

​

Desktop Review

Reviewing pipe materials, installation dates, soil data, maintenance and break history, cathodic protection records, and any prior survey work to identify segments that warrant closer attention.

​

Field Surveys

Targeted above-ground surveys (CIS, ACVG, DCVG, soil resistivity testing, structure-to-soil potentials) to characterize current pipeline condition and CP performance.

​

Direct Assessment

Selective excavation and direct visual and electrochemical assessment of pipeline segments identified as high-risk by the surveys, to confirm or refine the desktop and survey findings.

​

Risk Modeling and Prioritization

Combining the data into a risk ranking that lets utility management see, segment by segment, which pipelines are highest-risk, why they are highest-risk, and what the most cost-effective mitigation options are.

​

Reporting and Recommendations

Final deliverables include written analysis, prioritized recommendations, and supporting data presented in a form that integrates with how the utility plans capital projects and operations.

​

Corrosion Mitigation Alternatives

There is no single correct answer to a corrosion problem on a water pipeline. The right mitigation depends on the pipe material, the severity of the issue, the budget available, and the consequences of failure. Common options ICG evaluates with clients include:

• Cathodic protection system installation or upgrade for ductile iron, steel, and MLCP pipelines

• Coating repairs or recoating during scheduled rehabilitation

• Selective spot replacement of the highest-risk segments

• Full-line replacement when the cost of continued maintenance exceeds the cost of replacement

• Operational changes such as pressure management or water chemistry adjustments

• Enhanced monitoring to catch problems earlier even without immediate physical intervention

 

Each option has different costs, different service-life extensions, and different operational implications. ICG's role is to lay out the trade-offs clearly and let utility management make an informed decision.

​

Asset Management and Long-Term Planning

Corrosion risk assessment is most valuable when it feeds directly into a utility's asset management program. Single-point surveys produce data that ages quickly; an ongoing corrosion control program produces data that compounds in value over time.

​

ICG works with utilities to build the kind of long-term corrosion control framework that supports capital planning over five-, ten-, and twenty-year horizons. This includes defining survey schedules, developing risk-ranking methodologies that can be applied consistently across the system, training utility staff to interpret routine survey data, and producing the kind of defensible documentation that supports rate cases, bond elections, and grant applications.

​

ICG's Conference Work on This Topic

ICG has presented on water pipeline corrosion risk at industry conferences, including the AWWA Annual Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho and the APWA Fall Conference and Storm Water Expo. Topics have included causes of corrosion on buried pipelines, developing an asset management plan, condition assessments, asset prioritization, corrosion mitigation strategies, and training field personnel and management.